Strength, Power, and Speed: The Basics of Progression

In sports science, strength, power, and speed are foundational pillars of athletic performance, intricately linked yet distinct in their contributions. One quality builds upon the next over time, and no adaptation is more important than a base strength level. However, as athletes get more advanced the time spent generating more strength improvement works against the potential benefits of more power-speed focused designs. Understanding their interplay is crucial for optimizing training, from adolescents to professionals. 

Strength, the ability to generate maximal force (e.g., lifting a heavy barbell), underpins athletic capacity. It is the foundation for power, which is force applied rapidly over a short time (e.g., a vertical jump). Speed, the rate of movement (e.g., sprinting), relies on power to propel the body efficiently. These qualities form a hierarchical relationship: strength enhances power, which in turn drives speed. For young athletes, building a robust strength base is critical. It supports musculoskeletal development, improves force production, and reduces injury risk, laying the groundwork for advanced performance.

However, for elite athletes, simply increasing strength yields diminishing returns. Once a threshold of maximal force production is reached—often quantified as a squat or deadlift at 1.5–2 times body weight—further strength gains contribute minimally to power and speed. This is because high-level performance hinges on sport-specific demands, governed by the force-velocity curve. This curve illustrates that maximal strength (high force, low velocity) differs from power (moderate force, high velocity) and speed (low force, very high velocity). Elite athletes must prioritize training that aligns with their sport’s force-velocity profile.

Training for transfer is the application of transitioning gym-based movements to sport-specific movements. For example, a quarterback needs explosive power in the sagittal and transverse planes for throwing and evading defenders, while a sprinter requires linear speed. Exercises like plyometrics, medicine ball exercises, or sport-specific drills enhance this transfer by mimicking the biomechanical and neuromuscular demands of competition. Focusing on movement patterns, joint angles, and contraction speeds relevant to the sport optimizes performance where raw strength alone falls short.

For young athletes, strength training builds a foundation that supports long-term development. Programs emphasizing compound lifts (e.g., squats, lunges, rows, deadlifts) foster resilience and force production. As athletes progress, training shifts toward power and speed, incorporating dynamic movements like medicine ball throws or sprint drills. For elites, periodized programs balancing strength maintenance with sport-specific power and speed work are essential. Overemphasizing strength at this stage can lead to neural fatigue or reduced movement efficiency, detracting from performance.

Strength is still the cornerstone of athletic development, particularly in youth, but its role diminishes at elite levels where power and speed dominate. Training must evolve to prioritize transfer, aligning with sport-specific demands and the force-velocity curve. By understanding these interconnections, coaches and athletes can design programs that maximize performance while avoiding the pitfalls of overemphasizing strength.

References

1. Alcaraz, P. E., Carlos-Vivas, J., Oponjuru, B. O., & Martínez-Rodríguez, A. (2018). The effectiveness of resisted sled training (RST) for sprint performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 48(9), 2143–2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0947-8
2. Behm, D. G., Young, J. D., & Whitten, J. H. (2017). Effectiveness of traditional strength vs. power training on muscle strength, power and speed with youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00423
3. Cormie, P., McGuigan, M. R., & Newton, R. U. (2011). Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 2—Training considerations for improving maximal power production. Sports Medicine, 41(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.2165/11538500-000000000-00000
4. Loturco, I., Nakamura, F. Y., Tricoli, V., et al. (2015). Determining the optimum power load in jump squat using the mean propulsive velocity. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0140102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140102
5. Stodden, D. F., Campbell, B. M., & Moyer, T. M. (2008). Comparison of trunk kinematics in trunk training exercises and throwing. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815ef7a6
6. Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., Bellon, C. R., & Stone, M. H. (2018). The importance of muscular strength: Training considerations. Sports Medicine, 48(4), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0862-z